!
<body>

Wednesday, November 27, 2002

So who is the moron?

The Canadian PM's chief communications bod, Françoise Ducros, suggested George Bush is a moron, and had to resign for it.

UK TV comedy show 2DTV dared to make the same assessment and just had their butts kicked by the British advertising industry watchdog. (N.B. 2DTV is a huge hit in the UK at least in part due to their catering to the zeitgeist. As they clearly state in this BBC news article, they trot out a creative tirade of "Bush is a moron" gags every week and no one seems offended. In fact being offensive to Bush is their "bread and butter").

A Google search for "bush moron" brings up a (surprisingly low) 34,400 hits, including the website President Moron.

Surely by now the idea that George Bush is a moron is approaching the status of universally acknowledged truth? Even if you disagree, you must at least acknowledge the democratic right to hold and express this or most any other opinion?

I don't remember Nixon having to resign after referring to Pierre Trudeau as "that asshole"...

So who is the moron?

The Canadian PM's chief communications bod, Françoise Ducros, suggested George Bush is a moron, and had to resign for it.

UK TV comedy show 2DTV dared to make the same assessment and just had their butts kicked by the British advertising industry watchdog. (N.B. 2DTV is a huge hit in the UK at least in part due to their catering to the zeitgeist. As they clearly state in this BBC news article, they trot out a creative tirade of "Bush is a moron" gags every week and no one seems offended. In fact being offensive to Bush is their "bread and butter").

A Google search for "bush moron" brings up a (surprisingly low) 34,400 hits, including the website President Moron.

Surely by now the idea that George Bush is a moron is approaching the status of universally acknowledged truth? Even if you disagree, you must at least acknowledge the democratic right to hold and express this or most any other opinion?

I don't remember Nixon having to resign after referring to Pierre Trudeau as "that asshole"...

So who is the moron?

The Canadian PM's chief communications bod, Françoise Ducros, suggested George Bush is a moron, and had to resign for it.

UK TV comedy show 2DTV dared to make the same assessment and just had their butts kicked by the British advertising industry watchdog. (N.B. 2DTV is a huge hit in the UK at least in part due to their catering to the zeitgeist. As they clearly state in this BBC news article, they trot out a creative tirade of "Bush is a moron" gags every week and no one seems offended. In fact being offensive to Bush is their "bread and butter").

A Google search for "bush moron" brings up a (surprisingly low) 34,400 hits, including the website President Moron.

Surely by now the idea that George Bush is a moron is approaching the status of universally acknowledged truth? Even if you disagree, you must at least acknowledge the democratic right to hold and express this or most any other opinion?

I don't remember Nixon having to resign after referring to Pierre Trudeau as "that asshole"...

So who is the moron?

The Canadian PM's chief communications bod, Françoise Ducros, suggested George Bush is a moron, and had to resign for it.

UK TV comedy show 2DTV dared to make the same assessment and just had their butts kicked by the British advertising industry watchdog. (N.B. 2DTV is a huge hit in the UK at least in part due to their catering to the zeitgeist. As they clearly state in this BBC news article, they trot out a creative tirade of "Bush is a moron" gags every week and no one seems offended. In fact being offensive to Bush is their "bread and butter").

A Google search for "bush moron" brings up a (surprisingly low) 34,400 hits, including the website President Moron.

Surely by now the idea that George Bush is a moron is approaching the status of universally acknowledged truth? Even if you disagree, you must at least acknowledge the democratic right to hold and express this or most any other opinion?

I don't remember Nixon having to resign after referring to Pierre Trudeau as "that asshole"...

Tuesday, November 26, 2002

WebTorch - bang or whimper?

Turner Labs' latest remarkable innovation seems a sure fire winner. Or is it?

Check out the original WebTorch announcement from Turner Labs, here.

This worrying piece on the AP wire paints a less positive picture:

MIDDLE MANAGERS CLAMP DOWN ON WEBTORCH ABUSE

NEW YORK (AP) -- The runaway success of the "WebTorch" product has not been warmly received in all corners of corporate life. Several large American corporations have recently introduced policies to restrict use of the product; others have already moved to ban it outright.

Turner Labs' innovative WebTorch system taps into the latent photonic capacity in personal computing devices to provide high output illumination for a variety of typically dark environments.

Praised by many industry analysts and corporate CIOs as a significant advance in web based personal lighting, the WebTorch has already been adopted as a standard productivity aid in large corporations world wide, only days after its introduction.

It is unfortunate that one of the less obvious features of the product has quickly become one of its most popular; and one which may ultimately cast a gloom over Turner Labs’ plans for a public offering later this year.

Since the introduction of the WebTorch, office staff in corporations across the country quickly caught on to the fact that the product could easily be converted into a personal mirror. This has led to widespread evidence of users secretly indulging in personal grooming on company time in the privacy of their cubicles.

The well-documented propensity for vain and self-obsessed cubicle-dwellers to spend hours preening and grooming in company washrooms has led to a steady lowering of standards in commercial washroom cleanliness.

A recent report from the American Association of Janitorial Engineers indicated that U.S. corporations spent 32.7 per cent less on washroom cleaning and maintenance in 2001 compared to the previous year.

“If we do our jobs too well, people spend less time at their desks,” commented Carl Spackler, Association president. “No CEO really wants an Ally McBeal-style washroom. Cold, grey and smelly is the proven recipe for higher productivity,” he added.

The WebTorch relies on “top secret patented technology” to re-route the power from most standard computing devices, resulting in ultra high intensity lighting for low-illumination situations.

However, an undocumented feature of the product allows the screen output to be adjusted to a dangerously low level (referred to by savvy users as the ‘off’ setting). This renders the screen of the subject device almost completely black – allowing it to function as a serviceable vanity mirror for fiddling with one’s hairstyle or makeup.

“It’s really embarrassing to get caught squeezing blackheads in the company washroom,” commented one anonymous user. “Flipping my WebTorch to off, I can have a good long zit hunt, but anyone walking by would just think I’m staring intently at something on my PC.”

Turner Labs spokespeople were unavailable for comment.

WebTorch - bang or whimper?

Turner Labs' latest remarkable innovation seems a sure fire winner. Or is it?

Check out the original WebTorch announcement from Turner Labs, here.

This worrying piece on the AP wire paints a less positive picture:

MIDDLE MANAGERS CLAMP DOWN ON WEBTORCH ABUSE

NEW YORK (AP) -- The runaway success of the "WebTorch" product has not been warmly received in all corners of corporate life. Several large American corporations have recently introduced policies to restrict use of the product; others have already moved to ban it outright.

Turner Labs' innovative WebTorch system taps into the latent photonic capacity in personal computing devices to provide high output illumination for a variety of typically dark environments.

Praised by many industry analysts and corporate CIOs as a significant advance in web based personal lighting, the WebTorch has already been adopted as a standard productivity aid in large corporations world wide, only days after its introduction.

It is unfortunate that one of the less obvious features of the product has quickly become one of its most popular; and one which may ultimately cast a gloom over Turner Labs’ plans for a public offering later this year.

Since the introduction of the WebTorch, office staff in corporations across the country quickly caught on to the fact that the product could easily be converted into a personal mirror. This has led to widespread evidence of users secretly indulging in personal grooming on company time in the privacy of their cubicles.

The well-documented propensity for vain and self-obsessed cubicle-dwellers to spend hours preening and grooming in company washrooms has led to a steady lowering of standards in commercial washroom cleanliness.

A recent report from the American Association of Janitorial Engineers indicated that U.S. corporations spent 32.7 per cent less on washroom cleaning and maintenance in 2001 compared to the previous year.

“If we do our jobs too well, people spend less time at their desks,” commented Carl Spackler, Association president. “No CEO really wants an Ally McBeal-style washroom. Cold, grey and smelly is the proven recipe for higher productivity,” he added.

The WebTorch relies on “top secret patented technology” to re-route the power from most standard computing devices, resulting in ultra high intensity lighting for low-illumination situations.

However, an undocumented feature of the product allows the screen output to be adjusted to a dangerously low level (referred to by savvy users as the ‘off’ setting). This renders the screen of the subject device almost completely black – allowing it to function as a serviceable vanity mirror for fiddling with one’s hairstyle or makeup.

“It’s really embarrassing to get caught squeezing blackheads in the company washroom,” commented one anonymous user. “Flipping my WebTorch to off, I can have a good long zit hunt, but anyone walking by would just think I’m staring intently at something on my PC.”

Turner Labs spokespeople were unavailable for comment.

WebTorch - bang or whimper?

Turner Labs' latest remarkable innovation seems a sure fire winner. Or is it?

Check out the original WebTorch announcement from Turner Labs, here.

This worrying piece on the AP wire paints a less positive picture:

MIDDLE MANAGERS CLAMP DOWN ON WEBTORCH ABUSE

NEW YORK (AP) -- The runaway success of the "WebTorch" product has not been warmly received in all corners of corporate life. Several large American corporations have recently introduced policies to restrict use of the product; others have already moved to ban it outright.

Turner Labs' innovative WebTorch system taps into the latent photonic capacity in personal computing devices to provide high output illumination for a variety of typically dark environments.

Praised by many industry analysts and corporate CIOs as a significant advance in web based personal lighting, the WebTorch has already been adopted as a standard productivity aid in large corporations world wide, only days after its introduction.

It is unfortunate that one of the less obvious features of the product has quickly become one of its most popular; and one which may ultimately cast a gloom over Turner Labs’ plans for a public offering later this year.

Since the introduction of the WebTorch, office staff in corporations across the country quickly caught on to the fact that the product could easily be converted into a personal mirror. This has led to widespread evidence of users secretly indulging in personal grooming on company time in the privacy of their cubicles.

The well-documented propensity for vain and self-obsessed cubicle-dwellers to spend hours preening and grooming in company washrooms has led to a steady lowering of standards in commercial washroom cleanliness.

A recent report from the American Association of Janitorial Engineers indicated that U.S. corporations spent 32.7 per cent less on washroom cleaning and maintenance in 2001 compared to the previous year.

“If we do our jobs too well, people spend less time at their desks,” commented Carl Spackler, Association president. “No CEO really wants an Ally McBeal-style washroom. Cold, grey and smelly is the proven recipe for higher productivity,” he added.

The WebTorch relies on “top secret patented technology” to re-route the power from most standard computing devices, resulting in ultra high intensity lighting for low-illumination situations.

However, an undocumented feature of the product allows the screen output to be adjusted to a dangerously low level (referred to by savvy users as the ‘off’ setting). This renders the screen of the subject device almost completely black – allowing it to function as a serviceable vanity mirror for fiddling with one’s hairstyle or makeup.

“It’s really embarrassing to get caught squeezing blackheads in the company washroom,” commented one anonymous user. “Flipping my WebTorch to off, I can have a good long zit hunt, but anyone walking by would just think I’m staring intently at something on my PC.”

Turner Labs spokespeople were unavailable for comment.

WebTorch - bang or whimper?

Turner Labs' latest remarkable innovation seems a sure fire winner. Or is it?

Check out the original WebTorch announcement from Turner Labs, here.

This worrying piece on the AP wire paints a less positive picture:

MIDDLE MANAGERS CLAMP DOWN ON WEBTORCH ABUSE

NEW YORK (AP) -- The runaway success of the "WebTorch" product has not been warmly received in all corners of corporate life. Several large American corporations have recently introduced policies to restrict use of the product; others have already moved to ban it outright.

Turner Labs' innovative WebTorch system taps into the latent photonic capacity in personal computing devices to provide high output illumination for a variety of typically dark environments.

Praised by many industry analysts and corporate CIOs as a significant advance in web based personal lighting, the WebTorch has already been adopted as a standard productivity aid in large corporations world wide, only days after its introduction.

It is unfortunate that one of the less obvious features of the product has quickly become one of its most popular; and one which may ultimately cast a gloom over Turner Labs’ plans for a public offering later this year.

Since the introduction of the WebTorch, office staff in corporations across the country quickly caught on to the fact that the product could easily be converted into a personal mirror. This has led to widespread evidence of users secretly indulging in personal grooming on company time in the privacy of their cubicles.

The well-documented propensity for vain and self-obsessed cubicle-dwellers to spend hours preening and grooming in company washrooms has led to a steady lowering of standards in commercial washroom cleanliness.

A recent report from the American Association of Janitorial Engineers indicated that U.S. corporations spent 32.7 per cent less on washroom cleaning and maintenance in 2001 compared to the previous year.

“If we do our jobs too well, people spend less time at their desks,” commented Carl Spackler, Association president. “No CEO really wants an Ally McBeal-style washroom. Cold, grey and smelly is the proven recipe for higher productivity,” he added.

The WebTorch relies on “top secret patented technology” to re-route the power from most standard computing devices, resulting in ultra high intensity lighting for low-illumination situations.

However, an undocumented feature of the product allows the screen output to be adjusted to a dangerously low level (referred to by savvy users as the ‘off’ setting). This renders the screen of the subject device almost completely black – allowing it to function as a serviceable vanity mirror for fiddling with one’s hairstyle or makeup.

“It’s really embarrassing to get caught squeezing blackheads in the company washroom,” commented one anonymous user. “Flipping my WebTorch to off, I can have a good long zit hunt, but anyone walking by would just think I’m staring intently at something on my PC.”

Turner Labs spokespeople were unavailable for comment.

Monday, November 25, 2002

Fear in the Beach

LOTS of police activity in the neighbourhood tonight...

Three police choppers overhead as I walked home down our quiet little one-way street. Two circling, one stationary -- with the search light fixed on something to the south.

I could see the lights of what looked like at least a half dozen police cruisers at the foot of our road.

Sausage got back from her playschool meeting with rumours of a bomb scare or something of the sort at Balmy Beach School (just down the road). Several block strip along Kingston Road cordoned off; people being escorted to their homes by cops in full scary bastard gear.

Oh – and the helicopter searchlight was apparently fixed on the little florists’ shop right at the corner of our street.

Holy crap.

No idea what that was, but it was a little too close for comfort.

Fear in the Beach

LOTS of police activity in the neighbourhood tonight...

Three police choppers overhead as I walked home down our quiet little one-way street. Two circling, one stationary -- with the search light fixed on something to the south.

I could see the lights of what looked like at least a half dozen police cruisers at the foot of our road.

Sausage got back from her playschool meeting with rumours of a bomb scare or something of the sort at Balmy Beach School (just down the road). Several block strip along Kingston Road cordoned off; people being escorted to their homes by cops in full scary bastard gear.

Oh – and the helicopter searchlight was apparently fixed on the little florists’ shop right at the corner of our street.

Holy crap.

No idea what that was, but it was a little too close for comfort.

Fear in the Beach

LOTS of police activity in the neighbourhood tonight...

Three police choppers overhead as I walked home down our quiet little one-way street. Two circling, one stationary -- with the search light fixed on something to the south.

I could see the lights of what looked like at least a half dozen police cruisers at the foot of our road.

Sausage got back from her playschool meeting with rumours of a bomb scare or something of the sort at Balmy Beach School (just down the road). Several block strip along Kingston Road cordoned off; people being escorted to their homes by cops in full scary bastard gear.

Oh – and the helicopter searchlight was apparently fixed on the little florists’ shop right at the corner of our street.

Holy crap.

No idea what that was, but it was a little too close for comfort.

Fear in the Beach

LOTS of police activity in the neighbourhood tonight...

Three police choppers overhead as I walked home down our quiet little one-way street. Two circling, one stationary -- with the search light fixed on something to the south.

I could see the lights of what looked like at least a half dozen police cruisers at the foot of our road.

Sausage got back from her playschool meeting with rumours of a bomb scare or something of the sort at Balmy Beach School (just down the road). Several block strip along Kingston Road cordoned off; people being escorted to their homes by cops in full scary bastard gear.

Oh – and the helicopter searchlight was apparently fixed on the little florists’ shop right at the corner of our street.

Holy crap.

No idea what that was, but it was a little too close for comfort.

Friday, November 22, 2002

This was bound to happen...

I guess we all knew someone would get round to this eventually. The Chicago Tribune had an early stab at it a couple of days after Hu Jintao's appointment - but this later version, apparently from playwright James Sherman, is extremely well done:

HU'S ON FIRST
By James Sherman

(We take you now to the Oval Office.)

George: Condi! Nice to see you. What's happening?
Condi: Sir, I have the report here about the new leader of China.
George: Great. Lay it on me.
Condi: Hu is the new leader of China.
George: That's what I want to know.
Condi: That's what I'm telling you.
George: That's what I'm asking you. Who is the new leader of China?
Condi: Yes.
George: I mean the fellow's name.
Condi: Hu.
George: The guy in China.
Condi: Hu.
George: The new leader of China.
Condi: Hu.
George: The Chinaman!
Condi: Hu is leading China.
George: Now whaddya' asking me for?
Condi: I'm telling you Hu is leading China.
George: Well, I'm asking you. Who is leading China?
Condi: That's the man's name.
George: That's who's name?
Condi: Yes.
George: Will you or will you not tell me the name of the new leader of China?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir? Yassir Arafat is in China? I thought he was in the Middle East.
Condi: That's correct.
George: Then who is in China?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir is in China?
Condi: No, sir.
George: Then who is?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir?
Condi: No, sir.
George: Look, Condi. I need to know the name of the new leader of China. Get me the Secretary General of the U.N. on the phone.
Condi: Kofi?
George: No, thanks.
Condi: You want Kofi?
George: No.
Condi: You don't want Kofi.
George: No. But now that you mention it, I could use a glass of milk. And then get me the U.N.
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Not Yassir! The guy at the U.N.
Condi: Kofi?
George: Milk! Will you please make the call?
Condi: And call who?
George: Who is the guy at the U.N?
Condi: Hu is the guy in China.
George: Will you stay out of China?!
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: And stay out of the Middle East! Just get me the guy at the U.N.
Condi: Kofi.
George: All right! With cream and two sugars. Now get on the phone.
(Condi picks up the phone.)
Condi: Rice, here.
George: Rice? Good idea. And a couple of egg rolls, too. Maybe we should send some to the guy in China. And the Middle East. Can you get Chinese food in the Middle East?

-%-

With thanks to Philippe for the original reference.

The United States...squandered lives...including my own

Quality item: Build your own Bush speech.

Thanks Kate.

Monday, November 18, 2002

Google Sets

Hmmm...

Smart stuff showcased at the Google Labs site.

Google Sets "Automatically create sets of items from a few examples."

Example: type in 'Harpo' and 'Groucho', Google Sets completes the family for you.

So now I'm wondering if we could use this to help us narrow down our choice of baby names for the imminent third sprog...?

Enter: 'Michael', 'Leona', 'Charlie', 'Lily'...

Perhaps not.

Wonder if this list would be of any interest to Mr. Turner...?

Oh - nearly forget to mention: the excellent Blake pointed me to this site - the Social Security Administration's records of popular baby names in the U.S., tracked since 1990. Handy for cross-checking if you want to try to pick an uncommon name for your new weeun.

Also entertaining to track pop culture and other influences on the rankings. 'Luke', for example, is still climbing. 'George', on the other hand, appears to be suffering a reverse (while 'Bill', of course, ceased to register at all after 1993).

Missed opportunity

While Bill and Steve wax lyrical on the Tablet PC at Comdex, trying to pump up some more buzz around an already overhyped and rather flatly received subject, it strikes me they've missed a real opportunity by not showcasing the work Alias|Wavefront have put into making their new babies shine...

If you're still thinking Tablet PCs will likely have all the charm of an overlarge Palm Pilot, go here and click on the "Gallery" link.

Unhappy thought for the day...

Blogging will be both mainstream and over the day that Microsoft adds the word "blog" to Word's built-in spellchecker.

Revised UTFTD: Blogging will be both mainstream and over the day that Microsoft buys Blogger, Moveable Type, Userland or Gary Turner...

Ireland online...

...runs some strange want ads

I may be Weinberger, but at least I’m not Poindexter.

Seconds of ego-surfing fun to be had with this new GooglePeople thing – a Python app built on top of the Google Web API by the smart folk at AvaQuest.

Encouraged to discover that I am who I am:
GooglePeople is confident that the answer to your question Who is Michael O'Connor Clarke is:

Michael O’connor Clarke


Although it admits that it is possible I’m either David Weinberger, a Roman Catholic Diocese or Californian winemaker Pat Henderson...(?!)

Weinberger, OTOH, is emphatically Weinberger. The system is “very confident” that he is him. It still hedges, however, suggesting that there’s a possibility he might be Chris Locke or even (he’ll love this) John Poindexter.

Which is worse, I wonder – being mistaken for Rageboy or for the scarily toxic anti-constitutional architect of the Iran-Contra scandal? (Update: The Poindexter hit now seems to have dropped off the results list, for some reason. Shame).

On which note GooglePeople confidently identifies the secret identity of RageBoy, but is a little confused when it comes to some other famous (or infamous) alter egos:

Who is Deep Throat?
(apparently, Bob Woodward was talking to himself all along)

Who is Superman?
(Clark Kent only shows up 12th on the list and is outranked by both Jimmy Olsen and “Meta Tag”??)

Who’s your daddy?
(Good God, I hope not...)

Who is Number One?
“I am Number Two. You are Number Six...er...Elton?”

The suggestions for “Who is God?" are a little puzzling.

And while I’m concerned that they’re unable to answer this one with any confidence:

Who is The Shadow?

...they at least have a better stab at:

Who knows the evil that lurks in the heart of men?

Like I said – seconds of fun...

Wednesday, November 13, 2002

U.S. Foreign Policy Vision

David Weinberger gleefully posts the by now well-travelled pic of Dubya gazing through a pair of binoculars with the lens caps still firmly in place.

I SO want that shot to be true. I'm sure it is...

But, as my oldest brother has pointed out, the Snopes chaps make a good case.

Still - one consolation is that we all know we don't need goofy photos (doctored or otherwise) to prove to us that GWB is dumb - he manages to demonstrate that perfectly well with every syllable he utters, every move he makes, every breath he... (crap! how did Sting get in here?!)

Friday, November 08, 2002

Oink

If, like me, you're looking for the leaked Microsoft memo that questions the success of their Linux-bashing campaigns - you'll quickly discover that http://www.osi.org is not the home page of the Open Source Initiative.

Ahem.

Thursday, November 07, 2002

A tale of two call centres

In the last month or so we’ve had a couple of relatively minor but extremely annoying incidents with things breaking around the house.

First was the shower handle – what I’d call the tap, but what many of the visitors to this site would probably call a faucet. To save confusion, let’s agree to call it a knob – OK? OK.

It’s one of those clear plastic jobs – fairly standard turny-twisty thing, you'd think.

Somehow, the plastic on the inside of the shower knob just crumbled away one morning and the bleeding thing came clean off in my hand.

Right at the end of a nice hot shower, just as I’m turning off, of course. Dripping wet, cold, can’t turn the sodder off all the way – still spraying cold water at me. Bugger.

So that’s thing one to fix. Should be relatively straightforward, right? Hold that thought.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the house...

Charlie and I are in the kitchen, Saturday night about a month back. I’m roasting peppers under the grill while he sits colouring at the kitchen table.

(Ahem. BTW - many of you would probably want me to say that I was broiling the peppers in the range or some such malarkey. Sod that.)

So we’re roasting these peppers. I’m at the sink, pottering. Charlie comes over to show me his drawing. As he passes the fridge there’s a sharp bang – sounds like one of the heavier fridge magnets hitting the hardwood floor. I turn to check – there’s nothing on the floor. Hmmm...

Distracted by the boy’s art, I think nothing of it and, after suitably complimentary comments, return to the job in hand.

Couple of minutes later I open the stove door to check peppers. Sharp bang explained.

The inner glass door of the oven has frigging exploded all over the place, hasn’t it?

Looks like a bullet hit it – big central hole with cracks radiating out in all directions, broken glass all over the inside. (Peppers duly tossed in the bin, of course). Bugger squared.

So - now we’ve a knackered shower and a knackered oven.

Back to the shower knob. Cutting the long story down a little – let’s just say I paid many visits to many different hardware stores over a period of weeks.

I consulted numerous helpful plumbing section staff in brightly-coloured polyester aprons. I peered hopefully into many little plastic bubbles holding all sorts of interesting-but-not-quite-right-looking knobs, handles and widgets. I actually bought three different shower knobs that looked pretty much exactly like the one that broke.

Two of them I subsequently returned after a few hours wrestling manfully with the wrench in order to figure out that yes, indeed – they weren’t going to fit.

One sort of fitted and actually even kind of worked for a while, only to break again after a mere week of use. Grrrrr...

Meanwhile – back at the stove. Now, this thing’s probably not even 5 years old. Our house is only about 5 years old and we know the couple we bought it from didn’t buy the new appliances until they’d already been living here for a while.

I call Kitchen Aid - or is it Whirlpool Canada? Or Inglis? What the hell do they call themselves? It all seems to be the same company. I guess it’s kind of a Chrysler-Dodge-Plymouth thing, or something.

I’d checked before calling. Thankfully, the couple who sold us the house had kept all the warranty cards and assorted handbooks for all the appliances. The warranty information for the stove states:

“KitchenAid® ranges have a one-year FULL warranty, (parts and labour 1st year) on the entire product; a five-year LIMITED warranty (parts only 2nd - 5th year) on the electric elements/gas burners, ceramic-glass cooktop and electronic control; and a 10-year LIMITED warranty (parts only 2nd - 10th year) on the porcelain liner and inner door”

Of course, the customer service drone I talk to won’t have any of it. No – the warranty only covers “certain parts” in the door. But she won’t tell me what those parts are.

Er...hello? My oven door just fucking exploded with my 5 year old son not 6 feet away and you’re going to argue with me about the warranty terms?

OK. Drawing a deep breath, I book a service call. $69 “standard call out fee” even to get the sodder to turn up. Naturally the earliest time they can send someone is over a week away – the day after the Canadian Thanksgiving holiday in fact (good job we were heading to friends for our turkey this year).

Morning of the scheduled visit, the phone rings at about 7:30am. It’s the service guy. He’s calling to tell us he won’t be coming as “he has to order the glass”.

What?! No, really. What?! I mean WHAT?!!

Why the hell could you not have ordered the glass over a week ago when I first rang to book the service call? I don’t have a functioning oven. We have two young children in the house and our frigging cooker’s not working. YES I’d call it an emergency – what the fuck do you think? OK – so it’s not exactly life threatening, but it’s a major pain in the bum all the same.

He tells me the glass “shouldn’t take too long” to order – but can’t give me anything like a reasonable ETA. He hangs up, muttering something about calling us when he gets the parts...

Back over to shower knob central, I’m cruising the aisles at The Building Box store, weekend before last. Every kind of shower, tap and toilet fitting known to man, or so it seems. Every kind except the particular Moen replacement knob I need.

I’m starting to think they don’t make it any more – but the house is so new, how can that be?

Oh – forgot to mention – I’ve now managed to knacker two showers. In desperation to fix the main shower in the basement, I took the knob off the upstairs shower (same make and model).

As I carefully unscrewed this one from the tap, the plastic crumbled away in my hand. Swear to God – I didn’t force it or crush it, honest. Bugger just fell apart.


So. I’m in the Building Box. Starting to salivate – checking out all the fancy faucets, spray attachments, power nozzles. Going slightly dizzy, staring at a veritable cornucopia of shower knobs.

At last – at several points on the display wall, I sight my quarry! It does exist! O frabjous day!

Ahem. Except that it only exists as part of a complete knob, showerhead, tap set. Cheapest one – over a ton. Err. No thanks.

Luckily – helpful geezer in nylon apron thing wanders past. Suggests: “call Moen”.

Doh! *slaps forehead* But of course!

INTERMISSION

Mmm...nice cup of tea... OK, I’m back.

At long last, a few days after our weekend trip to the Building Box, the man from KitchenAid deigns to grace us with his presence. I return home from work that evening to find the stove door fully repaired, good as new. Sweet.

Then the nasty surprise: $180. One freaking hundred and eight zero bastard bucks. WTF?

Apparently it cost so much because he had to replace the entire interior door. It’s a sealed unit, you see. No serviceable replacement parts – if something breaks, you just have to replace the whole thing.

But hang on a minute...

“...a 10-year LIMITED warranty (parts only 2nd - 10th year) on the porcelain liner and inner door”

What parts? If you can’t repair or replace parts – what fucking parts? This thing is manufactured in such a way that when the inner door goes bloouie, you swap out the whole thing – so how can you have a warranty that only covers the “parts”. THERE ARE NO SODDING PARTS.

Oh, it’s a “limited” warranty, all right. So limited that it doesn’t appear to actually warrant anything. The whole thing’s just utterly moebian in its tangled logic – even getting worked up about it is making my head spin.

I’m picturing some horribly wizened and slime-coated lawyer at KitchenAid HQ, rubbing his greasy yellow palms together in sick glee at the tortured elegance of this particular bit of chicanery – “nyuk, nyuk, nyuk, nyahhhh. No one will ever get this one to stick. MWOO HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAA!!”

Bastards.

Switching back to shower knob torment for a second (the 4th plane of hell, if I remember my Dante): I make the call to Moen.

Well, actually – I first spent 45 minutes bashing through both the moen.com and moen.ca websites. Both have pretty spanky UIs. Both are equipped with well-thought out search functions. Both, alas, only served to confirm my suspicion that the specific shower knob I’m looking for – the twisty little crystal bastard that has come to haunt my waking dreams – does not, in fact, exist. At least, apparently not in this dimension.

Humble and defeated – feeling like the guy who gets so horribly lost he eventually has to stop to ask directions (as if!) – I call the 1-800 line.

After ten minutes on hold, I get through to a chipper sounding bloke in the Moen call centre.

I start to explain my problem, beginning to wander into my tale of the long, miserable, fruitless search, and gearing up for a really good shouting match with yet another clueless call centre git – when something quite bizarre and, frankly, a tad unsettling happens.

He apologizes.

While I’m reeling & dizzy from this vicious and totally unexpected outburst of politeness, he presses home his attack – asking me a couple of questions about the broken knob.

I read him the serial number stamped into the back of the plastic – he says: “OK, I’ll pop one in the post for you right now – can I take your name and address?”

Er...hello? Sure. I’m practically speechless at this point. My gast is so completely flabbered I think I actually even said the word “Wow” out loud.

I give him my address, thank him profusely and hang up – completely forgetting that of course I actually need two of the flipping things.

After a quick 20 minutes spent checking that I’m not hallucinating; that the world hasn’t actually spun clean off its axis; that I haven’t stumbled into a parallel dimension where “customer service” still means something to do with serving and customers...

I called back. Five more minutes on hold: chipper Moen bloke #2 picks up. Flustered, I’m in the middle of trying to explain what a complete doofus I am to these obviously lovely Moen people, when he pipes up: “Sorry, do you mind if I just put you on hold for a second?” (He even waited for me to say “yes” before parking the call and disappearing...)

Couple of minutes later, he’s back on the line – panting a little, out of breath (I’m not making this up) – “Sorry Sir, I just ran off to check – I’m afraid they’ve already processed that first order in shipping. It’s OK though, I’ll just book in another one for you – but they might not both arrive at the same time, I’m afraid.”

At this point, I actually blacked out.

Less than a week later, both shower knobs duly arrived intact, and they’re perfect. They are exactly the ones we needed. And supplied with grace, charm and the absolute minimum of hassle, and (key point here) COMPLETELY FREE.

(Last part of the mystery was even solved by the packing slip info, btw. They’re described as “hotel” units – probably not available through standard retail. Dodgy lot that built this house probably got ’em knocked off from somewhere – that’s why we couldn’t find the replacement in any store.)

MORAL:

I’ve already written a glowing letter of praise and thanks to the head of Moen Canada. I also intend to replace every knob, tap, faucet and other fitting in the entire house with quality Moen products.

In fact, I think I’ll buy Moen for every house I ever live in from now on.

Fuck it – I’m going to start banging holes in the basement wall, just so I can install more Moen products.

I mean, check this baby out. Or these little darlings. And how can you live without at least one of these in your life (Um...well...steady on now...)

I love Moen. All hail Moen. Thank you, Mr. Moen – I’m ready to have your babies now...

As for KitchenAid, you rotten, filthy, praetorian, scum-sucking toerags. You’re getting a letter too.

But this one I’m going to hand deliver.

I’m going to print it on nice heavy card, staple it to your bogus and dishonest “warranty” information, fold the whole thing into the pointiest, spikiest shape possible, and home in on your flabby complacent fundaments. Grab yer ankles, you sons of bitches...

Net: Moen good. KitchenAid bad.

/rant

Roar

Gary and I are stuck with the same dilemma at the moment.

Both working with our spouses to decide on suitable names for our soon-to-arrive new babies.

Going through lists of names with the kids around the kitchen table last night, Lily (3) suggested "Mouse". Charlie (5) snorts: "You can't call the baby 'mouse' - people will be too scared of him."

Me: "Oh Charlie, mice aren't scary - they're only this big..." - holding up finger and thumb a couple of inches apart.

Charlie (whispers): "Yeah - but they've got really big fangs!"

about

Michael O'Connor Clarke's main blog. Covering PR, social media, marketing, family life, sundry tomfoolery since 2001.



Creative Commons License


search

recent posts

recent comments

archives

links

admin